Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
« A new generation of freedom fighters | Main | A toast to libertarians everywhere »
Saturday
Oct222011

Watching brief

The British Medical Journal ("helping doctors make better decisions") has a section called 'Lobby Watch'.

According to a footnote:

Lobby Watch is a regular column that looks at people and organisations who have an influence on public health and on how health care is delivered. It is put together with the help of the public interest research team at Strathclyde University and those who work on the Spin Profiles website.

The current issue of the BMJ features the Save Our Pubs & Clubs campaign. Here is the article in full:

What is its goal?
The Save Our Pubs & Clubs campaign wants to see an amendment to the public smoking ban, which it says has led to hundreds of pubs and clubs going out of business since 2007. It would like the United Kingdom to be brought into line with other European countries where smoking is still allowed in some licensed premises or in "comfortable" outdoor smoking rooms.

The television chef and pub owner Antony Worrall Thompson is the campaign's patron. Supporters include the Working Men's Club and Institute Union, 251 pubs and clubs, the artist David Hockney, and the musician Joe Jackson.

MPs who have pledged their support include Brian Binley (Conservative, Northampton South), Philip Davies (Conservative, Shipley), John Hemming (Liberal Democrat, Birmingham Yardley), Simon Kirby (Conservative, Brighton Kemptown), Greg Knight (Conservative, East Yorkshire), and David Nuttall (Conservative, Bury North).

A total of 66 MPs supported Mr Nuttall's 10 minute rule bill to amend the smoking ban, debated in the House of Commons a year ago. And 36 MPs have signed Mr Binley's early day motion calling for a review of the smoking ban.

Who's backing it?
The campaign is run by the pro-smoking lobby group Forest (the Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco). Most of its money is donated by UK based tobacco companies.

Forest's director, Simon Clark, told the Scottish parliament's Health and Sport Committee in 2009 that Forest received about £250,000 (€285,000; $395,000) a year from three tobacco companies (JTI, British American Tobacco, and Imperial Tobacco Group.

Individual smokers known as Friends of Forest contribute donations ranging from £10 to £2000 to register their support, says the organisation. However, it is not a membership group run by a committee. Instead its role is to lobby politicians and the media.

The "best smoking area" category at this year's Great British Pub awards event was jointly sponsored by Save Our Pubs & Clubs and JTI, the world's third largest tobacco company.

So it's just a "front" organisation for the tobacco industry?
Forest says that it lost funding from a tobacco company for pursuing a campaign against HM Customs and Excise in 2001. It insists that it represents the consumer, not the tobacco industry. It speaks its mind as it sees fit and guards its independence jealously, whatever the cost, it says.

However, Mr Clark also told the Scottish parliament that without donations from tobacco companies it would be very difficult for Forest to exist.

Forest is currently campaigning to stop the smoking ban being extended to parks, beaches, and other outdoor areas. It is also fighting the "denormalisation" of smoking, the use of "junk science by the tobacco control industry", and discrimination against smokers, particularly in the workplace.

Does Forest have any more offshoots?
Yes, the Free Society. This is billed as an initiative set up to fight "big government" attacks on personal lifestyle choices on a broad front that includes tobacco, alcohol, and food.

The war on tobacco has moved from education to censorship and coercion, says the society. Today the "war on tobacco" has been joined by the "war on obesity" and the "war on binge drinking", it says.

"Genuine libertarians stick together and defend people's right to do things they themselves are not that keen on. If you enjoy a drink but don't smoke, you should still oppose the war on tobacco; if you smoke but don't drink, you should oppose excessive regulation of alcohol, and so on," it says.

Other areas of interest to the Free Society include motoring, in particular the excessive use of speed cameras and speed limits on motorways; closed circuit television cameras; compulsory identity cards; free speech; and global warming.

The Free Society co-hosts events with like minded libertarian groups such as the Institute of Economic Affairs, the Adam Smith Institute, the Democracy Institute, the Manifesto Club, Liberal Vision, and Privacy International.

Can't argue with most of that.

Meanwhile, in the Northampton Chronicle, "Features editor Anna Brosnan looks at the decline of members’ clubs across Northampton ... and what could be done to save them".

The article features the following comment by Barry Slasberg, general secretary of Kingsley Park Working Men’s Club and a member of the CIU national executive.

“The smoking ban is still having a huge effect on working men’s clubs and pubs and businesses. There is a big movement called SOPAC (Save Our Pubs & Clubs). We don’t want the smoking ban dissolved but we want the facility to have a smoking room where available.

“There is nothing illegal about smoking, it is a legal pastime which should be allowed.”

Full article here.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

Well, at least the article in the BMJ seems to be objective. That makes a change. Maybe the BMJ is beginning to cotton on to the fact that they have been being fed junk by the likes of Rapace and co for the last several years. Maybe even doctors are beginning to complain - after all, it is the GP who is going to have to tell a smoker that the local hospital will not treat his broken leg unless he gives up smoking.

I am proud to be a PET (a Person who Enjoys Tobacco), and I get prouder and prouder. The reason is that I am intellectually superior to the antis and the nons.

Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 2:05 | Unregistered CommenterJunican

"Tobacco control industry"? Not even the BMJ argue that one anymore.

Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 18:44 | Unregistered CommenterErik's Goldfish

So, do they have anything on ASH?

Monday, October 24, 2011 at 6:27 | Unregistered CommenterAnto

Incredible for the bmj. All true. What's going on?

Monday, October 24, 2011 at 12:10 | Unregistered Commenterjon

A bit of a jump in AWT petition after the bmj artical!!!

Monday, October 24, 2011 at 13:12 | Unregistered Commenterjohn

One error I believe. 86 MPs supported Mr David Nuttall MP when he attempted to amend the smoking ban. Not 66 as stated in your piece.

Monday, October 24, 2011 at 21:29 | Unregistered CommenterLou

This new section is simply great I've read it during last week and honestly I think it was included specifically for the enjoyment of the spectators.
Generic Viagra

Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 16:23 | Unregistered CommenterJames Parker

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>