Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace

Search (Showing 1 - 10 of 10)


0.
Journal Entry by Simon Clark on Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 10:14
On December 31, 2013, I wrote: Something has always puzzled me about the honours list and it's this. Why no gongs for the likes of Deborah Arnott, CEO of ASH ; Sheila Duffy, CEO of ASH Scotland; Fiona Andrews, director of Smokefree South West; or Andrea Crossfield, director of Tobacco Free Future ...
1.
Journal Entry by Simon Clark on Monday, March 21, 2011 at 10:08
The Scotsman has published a feature entitled 'Five years of the smoking ban'. The article includes comments from me, Paul Waterson of the Scottish Licensed Trade Association, Phil Hanlon and Jill Pell, professors of public health at Glasgow University, and Sheila Duffy, chief executive of ASH Sc ...
2.
Journal Entry by Simon Clark on Wednesday, March 7, 2012 at 9:10
Woke up to hear BBC news bulletins repeating, over and over again, that the smoking ban introduced in Scotland in 2006 has improved the health of unborn babies. The news was reported without – to the best of my knowledge – a single dissenting voice which is odd because, if you read the story on t ...
3.
Journal Entry Comment by Chas on Wednesday, March 7, 2012 at 16:01
The research was carried out by Prof Jill Pell who also falsely claimed that there was a big decrease in heart attacks after the ban.
4.
Journal Entry Comment by Frank on Monday, November 28, 2011 at 10:35
Take a look at their profiles. Jill Pell of the famous heart attack 'miracle'? Their expertise is not medical but social. As said, make valid and supported points not slogans or go away.
5.
Journal Entry Comment by Dick Puddlecote on Saturday, June 11, 2011 at 18:36
Hahahaha! Yesterday, ASH released a report accusing tobacco sources of cherry-picking studies to their own advantage ... and today they reference the Jill Pell study (17% reduction in heart attacks) of just 9 hospitals, instead of the official comprehensive NHS Scotland figures which showed no signi ...
6.
Journal Entry Comment by Dave Atherton on Saturday, June 11, 2011 at 18:42
@DP Just published this on the Edinburgh News. The Rand Corporation accuse Prof Pell of publication bias. "Ms Duffy should really get her foot out of her mouth and do some reading. Ms Duffy's reference to 17% reduction in heart attacks is the Professor Jill Pell's study in which she ...
7.
Journal Entry Comment by Frank on Saturday, November 26, 2011 at 7:54
In the wake of the ban, the phrase "It's a success" was bandied about as the catch all answer to every question. I'm having trouble working out what, exactly, the success bit is. Pub closures? yes, that's a 'success'. Compliance? yes, that's a success as we don ...
8.
Journal Entry Comment by BrianB on Sunday, July 14, 2013 at 23:09
Cut the faux outrage Tommasi. TBD never called you any names, nor was anyone personally insulted. In any event I have seen plenty of occasions where you have, yourself, resorted to precisely these tactics when you are grandstanding for a few of your little friends and helpers. With regard to your ...
9.
Journal Entry Comment by BrianB on Tuesday, April 30, 2013 at 16:37
Well I'm happy to rush to judgement - it's total crap! I have had only sufficient time to do a shallow analysis of this paper, but then it is very shallow in itself, so that may be appropriate. A few observations that I can make so far: 1. I would first invite anyone to have a look at th ...