Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
Wednesday
Mar122014

The price of freedom is eternal attendance

Love the spoof email sent to delegates attending the Freedom Festival in Bournemouth this weekend:

As you're probably aware, your place has been heavily subsidised, thanks to generous donations from individual Members of The Freedom Association. In return, you will be expected to attend all of the sessions (there's often more than one session going on at once - so just take your pick when that's the case!). If you fail to do so, you may be asked to leave the Festival with immediate effect.

Brilliant. Click here.

Wednesday
Mar122014

Spot the difference!

Here is the poster for No Smoking Day.

And here is the poster for, er, Vape for Victory.

Wednesday
Mar122014

No Smoking Day, a shadow of its former self

You may have read this before. If so, look away now.

Today is No Smoking Day. Now in its 31st year, it's a pale shadow of what it used to be.

When I joined Forest my predecessor assured me that, media wise, No Smoking Day and the Budget were our busiest days by far.

It's hard to imagine now but No Smoking Day was a very big deal. The Budget was significant too because successive chancellors (Ken Clarke and Gordon Brown) had introduced a tobacco escalator that caused tobacco taxation to soar and each year Forest was invited to comment on what was perceived to be another hammer blow for smokers.

The fact that No Smoking Day and the Budget took place within a week of each other and sometimes on consecutive days made it quite an intense period.

This was true for a few more years but the sheer volume of anti-smoking initiatives including campaigns to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship, prohibit smoking in public places, introduce graphic images, outlaw vending machine and ban the display of tobacco in shops – all these things took the edge off No Smoking Day. As I liked to say, "Every day is no smoking day."

It still gets its share of coverage regionally but the days when it dominated the national media are long gone.

Traditionally, in addition to all the anti-smoking messages, there would be a picture of members of the Lords and Commons Pipe and Cigar Club on the front page of the Telegraph and other broadsheets.

Frankly I never thought it was the greatest advertisement because they all seemed so ... old. Alive, but old (which I guess is an achievement).

And they were smoking Meershaum briars or Cuban cigars with not a cigarette in sight so they were hardly representative of your average smoker.

Anyway, that first year at Forest I was determined to do something different so we came up with the idea of spending the day in Paris.

The concept was we were fugitives from the No Smoking police and we wanted to escape to what was then the European capital of smoking.

So we invited about a dozen people to join us and the group set off at 8.00am from the old Eurostar terminal at Waterloo.

I remember the moment very well partly because I didn't go! I had to stay in London to coordinate all the media enquiries, and there were a lot, but I nevertheless went to Waterloo to see them off.

On board (Eurostar had a smoking coach in those days) my colleague Juliette Torres conducted a series of interviews with various radio stations and the party continued all the way to Paris.

In fact, that's when it really began because we had arranged for them to have lunch with our counterparts in France who took them to a restaurant used by the Resistance during the war. Perfect.

The group was accompanied by Daily Record features writer Bob Shields (plus photographer) and somewhere I have a fantastically atmospheric photograph of Bob and Juliette lighting a cigarette with the Eiffel Tower in the background.

The following year we organised a 'Smoker-Friendly Fry-Up' at Simpson's in the Strand – the Evening Standard's Pete Clark was a guest – but since then No Smoking Day has gradually lost its mojo.

I've done a couple of interviews this morning – BBC Radio WM and BBC Radio Nottingham with BBC Radio Northampton to come – but neither was about No Smoking Day.

In fact, Paul Hooper (regional tobacco policy manager West Midlands, Department of Health) had to mention it was No Smoking Day because the presenter sure as hell didn't!

If I was in charge of No Smoking Day I would consider that to be a monumental failure.

PS. The Budget became less of an event for Forest when Gordon Brown abandoned the tobacco escalator because it was fuelling the black market.

We remain though in a state of high alert in case any chancellor is silly enough to reintroduce it – hence my interview this morning on BBC Radio WM which was in response to a 'study' that suggests that 100,000 people would quit smoking if the price of cigarettes was increased by 45p.

Tuesday
Mar112014

Think carefully, Forest, you're on thin ice

There was a bizarre exchange on Twitter last night.

I wouldn't normally draw attention to it but it followed a comment I gave to the Scotsman for a report about e-cigarettes (see previous post) which I then promoted via Twitter.

Dick Puddlecote, generous person that he is, retweeted my tweet then tweeted:

Re last tweet, yet again @s_clark14 defending #ecigs as matter of principle - deserves a huge pat on the back and supportive RT

Well, after my recent travels I was tired and had an early night so I had no idea how incendiary our tweets were going to be.

This morning, on the train to London, I caught up. It wasn't pretty.

One vaper had tweeted:

Forest are a spectacular failure - join ecigs on Bandwagons R Us!!!

As I mentioned last week, my first post about e-cigarettes was in January 2010 and I have written or been interviewed about them many times since so we can hardly be accused of jumping on the e-cig bandwagon. And we've always tried to be supportive.

Another tweeted:

Simon is a brilliant advocate, but sometimes overplays vapers being anti-smoker.

Both statements are of course true!

What rankles however is not "vapers being anti-smoker" (although some are), it's the fact that very few speak out on issues such as plain packaging or smoking in cars.

We know this because we monitor Twitter and other social media and we know exactly what vapers are commenting on.

The same person then tweeted:

Playing the false 'victim' of vaper attitude just won't wash

Eh?!

Another vaper complained that I had failed to retract or apologise for something I had written in a post entitled The E-Cig Summit – another view in November.

One or two were clearly spoiling for a fight.

If Simon has a dig at vapers it could backfire on him bigtime! Like poking a wasps nest.

Latest blog defends e-cigs but digs at vapers. Thin ice.

Then:

If @s_clark14 wants to create the idea of a false conflict of vapers on to smokers then he might just get a real one. #thinkcarefully

Could backfire? Thin ice? Think carefully?

This, ladies and gentlemen, is what you get when you speak to a journalist in defence of e-cigarettes and then mention, in the mildest possible way, that it would be nice if vapers demonstrated the same level of support for smokers.

Meanwhile I formally declare that Forest is the voice and friend of the vaper, on both sides of the Irish Sea.

This morning Irish Rail announced that e-cigarettes are to be banned on all its trains and stations.

John Mallon, our man in Ireland, was immediately invited to take part in a discussion on Cork96FM and as I write he is on the Niall Boylan Show on Classic 4FM in Dublin.

Sorry if this offends vapers who believe that Forest has no business defending e-cigarettes ("The problem is this associates vaping with smoking in the public mind," wrote one) but I look at it this way.

A lot of our supporters use e-cigarettes either to reduce their consumption of tobacco or as an alternative to smoking in places where it is banned.

When we talk to the media about e-cigs we are representing them not the evangelical, born again vapers who appear desperate to denounce the habit they once embraced.

Forest will continue to support vaping (and vapers). But we will also speak out when we feel smokers are not getting the support they deserve.

In the meantime I urge vapers to show their support for Forest by following us on Twitter, joining the Friends of Forest Facebook group, or registering your contact details online.

H/T Dick Puddlecote for defending Forest while I was asleep! That's the kind of support you can't buy. Priceless and much appreciated.

Monday
Mar102014

Forest, voice and friend of the vaper?

A motion at a meeting of the British Medical Association Scotland will call for the Scottish Government to introduce severe restrictions on where e-cigarettes can be used and sold.

The full motion reads:

That this conference is concerned at the current lack of regulation of electronic cigarettes and, whilst welcoming the decision by the MHRA to regulate electronic cigarettes as a medicine, calls on the Scottish Government to:

i. include e-cigarettes within the products banned from use in enclosed public places
ii. prohibit the sale of e-cigarettes to those under 18 years
iii. ensure that e-cigarettes are only displayed for sale alongside other nicotine replacement therapies.

The Scotsman asked me for a response, which I was happy to provide. See: Call for ban on e-cigarettes in public places (Scotsman)

Amusingly, someone called Barry Lees has commented:

"Every time there's a story on the go about tobacco, the media fall over themselves to get a hold of Simon Clark as though he's some kind of medical expert ...

I posted this on Twitter and added:

No, just an advocate of choice working for a group with a 35-year history of defending consumer rights.

Meanwhile someone else tweeted:

The problem is this associates vaping with smoking in the public mind. Could Simon not refer enquiries to ECCA [Electronic Cigarette Consumer Association]?

To which I replied:

So ECCA can tell journalists e-cigs can "rid the world of tobacco" (and smokers)?

I then linked to a post I wrote a couple of months ago:

While Forest supports the development of e-cigs and other nicotine delivery systems because we are committed to choice, ECCA, their allies and their cheerleaders in the blogosphere sound more like Tobacco Control every day.

If ECCA wants to promote vaping in that manner so be it but don't expect Forest to help by directing the media in their direction.

We've got our own message and it doesn't involve ridding the the world of tobacco.

Sunday
Mar092014

The road to Hampden (via Inverness)

I'm currently in Inverness where Dundee United are playing Inverness Caledonian Thistle in the quarter final of the Scottish Cup, kick off 12.30.

It's a round trip of 1100 miles. The game is live on television so I could have watched it at home but I'd rather be here.

On television Scottish football looks worse than it is (and it's not great). Paltry crowds suggest a poor atmosphere but that's not the case when you're in amongst them. The pies are pretty good too.

I can't remember the last time I visited Inverness – we may have driven through on a trip to Ullapool a few years ago – so when the draw was made I thought it would be fun to go.

I booked a berth on the Caledonian Sleeper and the train left Euston on Friday night at 9.15pm. (There's no service on Saturday.)

I love the idea of sleeper trains but the reality is quite rough, even in first class (which I treated myself to).

Put it this way, the Caledonian Sleeper is no Orient Express, although the attendant was very sweet.

I'll never forget the first time I travelled on a sleeper train. My father worked for Nestle and he was sent to manage a factory in Dundee.

So in May 1969 we left our home in Maidenhead, drove to the old motor rail terminal in Olympia and arrived the next morning in Perth, ready to begin a new life in Scotland.

Later, when I lived in Edinburgh in the Nineties, I was a regular on the overnight sleeper. It was cheaper than staying in a hotel in London and for an extra £25 you could have a compartment to yourself, even in standard class.

It may be an additional £40 now but it's worth every penny. The sleeping berths are so small you really don't want to share with anyone, let alone a stranger.

Anyway, I've travelled by train to most parts of the country but I've never done the Highland line between Perth and Inverness and I've always wanted to.

So yesterday morning, after a fitful night's sleep, I made sure I was awake at 6.00am to enjoy the scenery.

We were already at Pitlochry (where I camped with friends in 1973 and got hideously drunk on Newcastle Brown Ale) and heading toward the Cairngorms.

I sat up in bed and watched as the rolling hills turned into small mountains. There was snow on most of the peaks and although the sky was grey and overcast we still got a pretty good view.

The train stopped at various stations – Blair Atholl, Newtonmore, Kingussie – where there were few signs of life.

Eventually, at 8.30, we rolled into Inverness and momentarily I felt a long way from home. It was too early to book into my hotel so I found a coffee shop, and later a pub, wandered around and generally killed time.

The city centre is nothing to write home about but there are some beautiful Victorian houses along the banks of the picturesque River Ness, many of them converted into small hotels overlooking the river. I'm staying in one of them.

Directly across the river is the Eden Court Theatre, a modern building that nevertheless blends in well with its surroundings. I got quite excited, thinking I could finally see a production of The Mousetrap, but it's not on until June. I'll have to come back.

It's an idyllic spot but I've got to check out in a few minutes.

After the match I've got a long wait until the sleeper takes me back to London. (It leaves at 8.30pm, arriving in Euston eleven and a half hours later at 8.00.)

Apparently the hotel next to the station offers "wash and change" rooms you can book for four hours. I might do that, or I might settle down next to the fire in the drawing room and read a book.

Or I might watch England-Wales. In a pub. In Scotland.

It doesn't get much better than that.

PS. Road signs to Kyle of Lochalsh remind me of another train journey.

At Aberdeen University in the Seventies the student charities committee organised an annual trip to Kyle of Lochalsh which overlooks the Isle of Skye.

They would charter a train and 400 students would embark on a round trip that involved a huge amount of alcohol and almost no food apart from mugs of soup.

In my first year, as a member of the charities committee, I helped organise the event. All went well (apart from one student splicing off the top of his thumb in a sliding door) until we got to our destination on the west coast.

Although press reports exaggerated the carnage it is fair to say that some students ran amok. One even fell in the water (it was February and freezing) trying to jump on the Skye ferry which had just set off.

On the way back a four hour journey became a 16-hour descent into hell. The communication cord was pulled so many times the train eventually ran out of fuel.

British Rail (as it then was) took the decision to put the train into a siding outside Inverness and wait for everyone to sober up. We eventually limped back into Aberdeen the following morning.

The next year we had more problems on the return journey but for very different reasons.

This time the weather was so bad we were the last train allowed to leave Kyle of Lochalsh but that didn't stop us getting stuck in snow en route.

Somewhere, in the Aberdeen Press & Journal archive, there is a newspaper with a picture of me and my friend Dougie Kerr, later chairman of the charities committee, apparently digging the locomotive out of a huge snow drift with a couple of spades.

In truth, we were doing it merely for the camera. The real work was going on out of shot.

That night we shared our soup with some OAPs who were on another train, going in the opposite direction, that was also stuck in snow.

As a result, and in contrast to the previous year, the local press treated us like heroes rather than drunken louts.

Sadly that was the last Aberdeen student charities' train. Curiously, the event never seemed to make any money.

I'm told the residents of Kyle of Lochalsh breathed a huge sigh of relief.

Saturday
Mar082014

The burning question: why did you start smoking?

Our new website Plain Packs Plain Stupid features a video, 'The Burning Question', that has interviews with smokers in Dublin.

Asked 'Why did you start smoking?', replies included:

“I started smoking when I was a teenager, probably because everyone else was doing it so I did it too to be cool, I suppose.”

“I started smoking because I was really young, had nothing to do, and all my friends were doing it.”

“I started smoking when I was 15 ... My sister smoked. There was no real reason why I did, I just wanted to try.”

“I started smoking at 28. I started because of a relationship, a girl. I’d just split up ..."

“I started smoking at 21. I was the social smoker relying on friends to provide the occasional cigarette. That became uncomfortable so I started buying my own packs.”

“I started smoking when I was about 17, way back in the late Sixties. It was a sort of daring thing to do in those days.”

“I started smoking … when I was 27 or 28. It was something different to do.”

“I started smoking when I started secondary school ... All my friends were smoking and I kind of felt I needed to fit in more.”

To share or embed The Burning Issue video on your own blog or website, click here.

Friday
Mar072014

Plain packs, plain stupid

I'm pleased to announce the launch of a new campaign website.

Here's an edited version of the press release for Plain Packs Plain Stupid.

Campaigners launch new website to fight plain packaging of tobacco

The smokers' group Forest Eireann has launched a new website to fight plans to introduce plain packaging of tobacco in Ireland.

The site, which has a sludge brown background to highlight the dull packaging proposed by Health Minister James Reilly, lists some of the consumer arguments against standardised packs.

It also features a campaign video, 'The Burning Issue', that features interviews with smokers in Dublin.

John Mallon, spokesman for Forest Eireann, said:

"The proposed legislation is not fit for purpose. Advocates say plain packaging will deter children from smoking.

"People start smoking for many reasons, often peer pressure, but packaging isn't one of them.

"I don't know any smoker who began because they were attracted by the packet. It's nonsense.

"Plain packaging is gesture politics. It won't stop children smoking but it might encourage an illicit market in branded or counterfeit packs.

"We urge the government to abandon this reckless experiment that could do far more harm than good."

Full press release here.

Click on this link to visit the Plain Packs Plain Stupid website.