Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
« Is prohibition back? | Main | Washington memories »
Tuesday
Sep272022

GTNF - here we go again

It’s always nice to be back at GTNF, the annual tobacco (and nicotine) conference, although it’s also true that fings ain’t wot they used to be.

When GTNF was launched in 2008 (in Rio) it was called the Global Tobacco Networking Forum and vaping was still in its infancy so I don’t know if it even got a mention.

I didn’t go to Rio but I’ve attended every GTNF (bar one) since - Bangalore (2010), Antwerp (2012), Cape Town (2013), West Virginia (2014), Bologna (2015), Brussels (2016), New York (2017), London (2018) and London again (2021).

The exception was Washington in 2019. I can’t remember why I didn’t go but I assume it was because of my (self-imposed) rule that if I’m not invited to speak I won’t go because it’s not worth the money if I’m only there to make up the numbers.

I’m sorry if that sounds self-important but rules are rules! Truth is, as the representative of an unfashionable cause (smokers’ rights) I’m holding on by my fingertips and I have to take a stand.

The last GTNF I can honestly say felt pro-tobacco took place in Cape Town in 2013 when our hosts, led by some plain speaking South African tobacco farmers, made their views very clear.

‘Stop apologising’ seemed to be their message and as I remember, and wrote at the time, it was rather refreshing.

The following year, in West Virginia, I was given - for the first and only time - a keynote speech to talk about Forest and our work but even then the agenda was changing in favour of speeches and presentations about tobacco harm reduction and reduced risk products.

To be clear, I have no problem with the industry evolving in that direction as long as the interests and choices of confirmed smokers are acknowledged and respected and to be fair, while they may be marginalised, GTNF has never completely abandoned them, unlike every other tobacco or nicotine-related conference.

Anyway, at some point in the last ten years (I can’t remember which year) GTNF changed its name to the Global Tobacco and Nicotine Forum. It may have been 2015, the year we went to Bologna, because I remember sitting next to another delegate - from America - who was obviously perplexed that anyone would want to defend smoking.

I felt like saying, ‘You do know this is a tobacco industry event?’, but it was obvious even then that I was in an increasingly small minority of delegates who were prepared to say anything in defence of smoking.

Nevertheless even I was surprised when in 2017 the PMI-funded Foundation for a Smoke Free World was launched at GTNF in New York. Not even Lewis Carroll could have made that up.

Anyway here I am at GTNF 2022 and this year I’m speaking on a panel that will address the issue of prohibition.

The session however is not part of the main conference that begins at the Four Seasons Hotel tomorrow. Instead we’re like the warm-up act, one of three afternoon sessions before the Welcome Reception at the Hay-Adams Hotel this evening.

It will be filmed though so there should be an opportunity to watch it, and all the other sessions, at a later date. I’ll keep you posted.

In the meantime here are some of my favourite GTNF moments. They stand alongside some of my best memories of working for Forest:

Bangalore (2010): Our arrival at our seven-star hotel at six o’clock in the morning following an eleven-hour flight is a moment I shall never forget as rose petals were showered on our heads by staff standing on the mezzanine above the spacious reception area. My large luxurious room lived up to the warm welcome and even better was the covered outdoor bar where we gathered for drinks. The Australian cricket team was staying there too and after the conference was over I spent an afternoon at the Bangalore Test match in the company of journalist Mick Hume, founding editor of Spiked. How we weren’t killed crossing a busy main road on our return to the hotel remains a mystery.

Antwerp (2012): Without question, this was the most bizarre conference location ever. Overnight delegates stayed in one of two hotels but the actual conference took place on board two boats that spent the day (and much of the evening) at sea, and there was no escape! On the second day we were advised to take our passports and all became clear when we found ourselves in a small town in the Netherlands where we were given a guided tour followed by a street party in our honour. Extraordinary.

Cape Town (2013): Regrettably, in hindsight, I saw relatively little of the city because having been warned at length of all the terrible things that might happen if we left the security of the hotel compound I erred on the side of caution. Nevertheless I had a wonderful view of Table Mountain from my room at Mount Nelson Hotel (named after Horatio not Mandela) and I enjoyed the post conference excursions to some of the local vineyards. The whale watching? Not so much.

West Virginia (2014): The conference venue was The Greenbriars, an enormous almost Gothic building (and golf resort) in White Sulphur Springs, a small town in the middle of nowhere - four hours by road from Dulles Airport, Washington, or six hours by rail. Unforgettably, the welcome reception took place inside a nuclear bunker that had been built beneath the hotel in the Fifties so that, in the event of a nuclear strike on Washington, Congress could continue the business of government underground. The bunker remained a secret until 1992 when it was exposed by the Washington Post.

See also: GTNF 2012 - The highs and lows
Out of South Africa - GTNF 2013
Greetings from the Greenbrier - GTNF 2014
Pork chop at a bar mitzvah - reflections on GTNF 2015
Mandela, moon landings and JFK - GTNF 2017

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

The industry is so arrogant it thinks it can push smokers to whatever new product it puts on the market.

Many smokers have no intention of quitting nor do they want to get involved with the sterile and boring new anti smoker devices designed to please the puritanical anti smoker industry while conning smokers into thinking it is just the nicotine that makes smoking enjoyable.

Smokers will eventually stop funding these Goliaths and put their money into smaller tobacco companies which don't stigmatise them but treat them with respect.

Home grown tobacco will also become more popular as a means of protesting against these Big Tobacco cads.

Smokers who do not want to be pushed around should look for alternative sources for buying tobacco than the arrogant so called industry leaders who are pandering to the minority consumer while alienating their core consumers who have kept their businesses going for hundreds of years - including through the hardest of hard times.

Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 14:47 | Unregistered CommenterPat Nurse

"Home grown tobacco will also become more popular as a means of protesting against these Big Tobacco cads."

I fear that is very unlikely, Pat.

New Labour and ASH made it impossible for the law abiding gardener.

Excise Notice 476: Tobacco Products Duty
Updated 25 January 2021

2.10 Private individuals and payment of duty on tobacco products made from tobacco grown themselves

"A private individual must pay the duty on any tobacco products that they make from tobacco which they have grown. This applies whether the tobacco products are intended for sale or solely for the grower’s own consumption."

3.3 How Tobacco Products Duty is charged

"Herbal smoking products that do not contain tobacco are also be liable to tobacco products duty in the same way and at the same rate as their tobacco equivalents."
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/excise-notice-476-tobacco-products-duty/excise-notice-476-tobacco-products-duty

The surprising inclusion of herbal cigarettes may be due to this

Consultation on the Smokefree Elements of the Health Improvement and Protection Bill ( Trades Union Congress )
"The TUC is concerned that the proposed definition will allow the smoking of herbal cigarettes.
This could lead to people mixing tobacco with herbal mixtures to disguise the fact they are smoking tobacco.
In addition the smoke from many herbal mixtures is just as likely to trigger asthma attacks.

While the evidence of harm relates only to tobacco at present, this is because no or little research has been done on the effects of herbal mixtures and we are surprised that the D of H is not taking a precautionary approach."

http://www.smokefreeaction.org.uk/archive/consultation%20submissions/TUCsubmission.html
Now unavailable

Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 21:38 | Unregistered CommenterRose2

This man is ignoring them and you can be sure that many more will too when they see how easily it can be done. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/19558905/smoker-save-cigarettes/

There are also many people who discreetly grow illegal tax-free marijuana for personal use so what the authorities don't know goes under the radar unnoticed.

People can grow tax free tobacco just as discreetly and are more likely to get away with it because there is no pungent smell when a simple garden plant like tobacco grows - and the best thing about that is that it denies the bullies and shameless charlatans in PMI and other anti smoker tobacco companies any profit from the product that they say they do not want. After all, how many times has PMI urged us to quit using its products?

I say grow your own or do as I do and buy from a legal source that is not owned by PMI and let's see PMI put its money where its mouth is as its profits begin to decline.

Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 16:05 | Unregistered CommenterPat Nurse

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>