Ken Clarke: don't judge Secretary of State for Health for enjoying a cigar and a drink

The appointment of Thérèse Coffey as Secretary of State for Health hasn't been universally welcomed.

No surprise there but it's disappointing that some of the comments have focused on her weight and a now infamous photo in which she is pictured smoking a cigar and drinking what looks suspiciously like a glass of champagne. (Oh no!)

To his credit former Chancellor of the Exchequer Kenneth Clarke (now Lord Clarke of Nottingham and a former Secretary of State for Health himself) has sprung to her defence.

Writing in The Times last week he made the not unreasonable point that Coffey should not be judged for enjoying a cigar and a drink:

This winter is going to be very rough in the National Health Service and we are going to have strikes in large proportion all over the public sector, probably way through the winter. When you’ve a real catalogue of crises, the one thing we don’t want to start judging ministers on is their personal lifestyle — as long as they’re not doing anything illegal or immoral or that otherwise makes them unattractive people.

About his own smoking habit he wrote:

I know I ought to feel guilty [about smoking when he was Secretary of State for Health] but I’m going back 30 years and I don’t. I realise I’ve been lucky — I’m not denying that smoking is the biggest single cause of lung cancer in the country. I do acknowledge the change in mood and these days would have more regard for people who don’t smoke. But life has risks and smoking is one I’ve willingly incurred because it’s a nice part of my lifestyle — I’ve never made any attempt to give up.

Nothing wrong with that, in my book, but when I tweeted a link to the article with an edited version of that quote and it was retweeted by left wing commentator Ian Dunt (a former smoker) some of his 394.8k followers saw it differently:

Anything that hastens Coffey's demise receives my full blessing.

I enjoy a drink and a cigar. I AM NOT THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE.

I don’t care about how Coffey looks, whether that be physically/how she dresses! I don’t care if she drinks or smokes! I do care that like many in this government she’s fucking awful at her job! Attacks on her for anything else are a smokescreen to detract from her incompetence!

The words spoken by every addict of every type of addiction. Including me before I gave up smoking and realised that I could enjoy my lifestyle just as much - actually, even more, when I wasn't indulging in a potentially deadly activity every hour of the day.

Others commented on Clarke's former role with British American Tobacco. (He was deputy chairman from 1998 to 2007.) One person tweeted:

That's the Ken Clarke who joined the board of BAT saying people shouldn't criticise smoking? Quelle surprise.

To which I replied:

Why should anyone criticise smoking? You can point out the health risks but if an adult chooses to smoke a legal product - with consideration for those around them - what’s it got to do with anyone else?

Thanks to Ian Dunt my original tweet has now been viewed 46,375 times which may be a record for me because most of my tweets go under the radar.

Anyway it reminded me (and I need no excuse to wheel out my greatest hits) that in the spring of 2000 I interviewed Ken Clarke for the Forest magazine Free Choice. We met in his office overlooking Parliament Square and the first thing he did was light a cigar. You can read the full interview below.

Rare among modern politicians, former Chancellor Ken Clarke not only smokes, he is happy to be photographed lighting up and even happier to talk about it. The fact that he is paid a substantial sum by British American Tobacco (BAT) may have something to do with it but, let’s be fair, Clarke has never hidden his lighter under a bushel.

Indeed, like many people, the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP began smoking cigarettes when he was a teenager. He gave up when he became a pupil barrister and is now a steady cigar smoker, as I could tell from all the ashtrays in his splendid new office in Portcullis House where he enjoys a clear view of Parliament Square and the Palace of Westminster.

He is characteristically upbeat about his habit. ‘I enjoy smoking cigars. I smoke an ordinary brand by day and the odd Havana in the evening. That’s one of my pleasures.’

He knows there are health risks. ‘I always have. If I was told the health risk was much more dramatic than I believe it to be, although I don’t dismiss it, I’d give up, but I’ve done a bit of motor racing in my time and I think that’s probably more of a health risk. I do it because I enjoy it. I enjoy food, I enjoy drink in moderate quantities, and I think if I didn’t do those things I’d be a much more stressed individual in a very stressful job.’

The traditional smoke-filled room may be a thing of the past, but it wasn’t long ago that the-then Chancellor of the Exchequer was engaged in a battle far more serious than monetary policy. He eventually resolved his confrontation with fellow smoker Eddie George, Governor of the Bank of England, by having two ashtrays. Their meetings, he laughs, took place ‘in a very smoke-filled atmosphere’.

Today Clarke is increasingly worried about the smuggling of cigarettes because ‘I don’t think taxation should encourage criminality. If the Treasury was losing billions of pounds because people were cutting smoking for their health, that’s one thing, but they’re losing billions because black market cigarettes are taking more and more of the market.’

If he was in [Chancellor] Gordon Brown’s shoes, Clarke would reduce tobacco taxation. ‘But I understand the political difficulties. If you are in government you can’t upset the health lobby entirely and government has a legitimate role to play in informing people of the health risks and making them think about them. Somehow, we’ve got to persuade the health lobby that the policy is not fulfilling their intended purpose.’

If this sounds a bit rich coming from a man whose government initiated the tobacco tax escalator, you’re not alone. He bristles, however, when I suggest he’s being hypocritical. ‘Our government had plainly decided that our policy was to raise the price in order to get people to think more seriously about the health hazards. It means that we were really contemplating that one day our revenue might fall if the policy actually succeeded and we were quite braced for that.

‘The reason I am now critical is that we have started to lose revenue on a vast scale for the wrong reasons. It was never the policy that we should help smugglers, but with hindsight all those Budgets did more good to smugglers than they did to anybody else, and that’s why I think the [Blair] Government should revisit it because the policy is not achieving its declared objective. There’s no hypocrisy. It was just a failure to have the policy produce the desired results.’

Health and taxation aside, Clarke insists he is and always has been a libertarian. ‘I believe in the title of your magazine, Free Choice. I think the Government has a duty to tell the public honestly and genuinely what the health risks are, so long as they’re based sound scientific evidence, and thereafter adults are free to make their own minds up.

‘I think a democratic society is a tolerant society and people are free to make their own choice about their lifestyle, and I probably take more risks when I drive my car than I do when I’m smoking a cigar inside a car.’

This, says Clarke, is the reason he’s a right of centre rather than a left of centre politician. ‘I disapprove of all these attempts to interfere in people’s lifestyles. I’m not an interventionist and I do think that there are areas of people’s lives which lie outside politics.’

Surprisingly for a committed Europhile who some Conservatives believe has been deeply treacherous for sharing a pro-euro platform with the likes of Tony Blair, Clarke opposes tax harmonisation. ‘I used to argue there was a case for approximating taxes on tobacco, alcohol and diesel. I thought that tax competition would make us move closer together towards the lower levels of tax as governments found they were losing out by having higher levels of tax than their neighbours. But it just hasn’t worked with tobacco because our policy is so dramatically different from that of our neighbours that moved even further apart.’

The euro isn’t the only issue on which he and the present Tory leadership disagree. Although he seems relaxed about the prospect, Clarke is opposed to the proposed ban on tobacco advertising and sponsorship. ‘I’ve never believed that tobacco advertising causes people to take up smoking. Teenagers take up smoking for a variety of reasons but it isn’t because they’re seen the slogan on the motor car and our government resisted all pressure for tobacco advertising to be banned throughout our entire [18-year] period in office.’

He is even less enthusiastic about the Tories’ extraordinary plan to target young adults who smoke. ‘In an age where we’re more liberal in our attitude towards the behaviour of young people than we’ve ever been, and in a society which positively encourages young people to do all kinds of crazy things, it seems utterly bizarre to single out tobacco as something which you don’t allow them to make their own responsible choice about. I personally would stick to the division between people who are under 18 and those who are 18 and over and when people are adult they are as ready to make an informed choice about smoking as anybody else.’

Defending his decision to work for British American Tobacco he juts out his chin and says he was pleased to be approached and that ‘It would have been rather hypocritical of me to suddenly decide there was some reason why I shouldn’t join BAT when I’d been quite open in my views on tobacco and smoking over the years. If I felt any doubts about working in the industry I wouldn’t work in it.’

He is dismayed however that [Labour] Government shows little sign of wanting to speak to the industry. As for the Health Select Committee, it was described by BAT’s Martin Broughton as a ‘kangaroo court’, which is probably unfair to kangaroos. Nevertheless, as one who was also questioned by this bizarre bunch of backbenchers, I knew what he meant.

‘If you are trying to tackle these problems in a responsible and balanced way it’s an advantage to work with the people who know the tobacco market best, and that is the tobacco companies, and if the Government were to refuse to have any dealings with us and to rely solely on the views of extremist campaigners they will get a very peculiar view of what goes on. I do prefer common sense to the zealotry of single issue campaigners.’

Talking of which, even this most laidback of politicians is puzzled by the persistence of the more extreme anti-smokers. An incident in the Rocky Mountains sticks in his memory. ‘There were probably more bears than people when a middle-aged American woman, who I could see in the distance some three or four hundred yards away, scrambled over rocks, through brambles, and said would I warn her if I was going to smoke again because it gave her migraine. She must have been using binoculars to see that I was smoking so I think her migraine had more to do with her state of mind than it had to do with my cigar.’

He may be pig-headed on some issues but we need more politicians like Kenneth Clarke – people who smoke, drink, enjoy their food and are not ashamed to admit it. Better still, a politician who admits his policy was wrong. Now, if only he had done that when he was still in office.

Ken Clarke stood for the Conservative party leadership three times, in 1997, 2001 and 2005. From 2017 to 2019 he was Father of the House of Commons, a title bestowed on the longest serving continuous member of the House. He stood down as an MP before the December 2019 election. He was nominated for a peerage by Boris Johnson and is now Lord Clarke of Nottingham.

Comments

[Pat Nurse]

One of the most repulsive characteristics of anti smokers is the ugly abuse they feel entitled to throw at anyone who disagrees with their view on smoking, smokers, or tobacco.

My only bone of contention with cigar smokers is that they tend to feel more superior than cigarette smokers and somehow believe that their habit is more social and acceptable.

The Twitter responses by the anti-smokers and sanctimonious quitters demonstrate everything that is wrong with the ideology of anti smokerism. They claim to care about the health, well being, and alleged inequality of people who smoke but soon resort to hurling and inciting hatred against any smoker who is happy with their lifestyle, doesn't feel addicted, has no adverse health issues, and simply has no intention of quitting for the smokerphobic idea of a brave new ideological world that has no smokers in it.

What is on show more than anything with this issue is the sheer hypocrisy of the claim that "it's about health'. It clearly is not. It is about hatred and intolerance from people with superiority complexes looking down with prejudice on those they see as lesser human beings based on the identity of "smoker" that has been forced upon them for the purposes of discrimination and to ensure they are treated less equally than others.

It would be great if Liz Truss's team could see this sham for what it is but I still remain doubtful - especially in light of Ken Clarke's acceptance that the public has "less regard" for people who smoke which I think is generally the authoritarian view no matter which party is in power and that is why they feel justified in treating legitimate adult tobacco consumers as second class citizens who deserve nothing but continual harassment. The dehumanisation of smokers is the only acceptable hate campaign that is legitimised for use against any targeted, minority, identified group of people. They may call us smokers but we are people just like them and there used to be a time in this country when all people, especially those in minority groups, had rights.