Claire Fox targets public health in “rollicking speech”
It's been a busy week.
Unfortunately there was a clash of events and I couldn't attend both the Golden Nanny Awards in Dublin and the latest Forest event in Brussels.
I therefore missed what Politico Europe described as a "rollicking speech" by Claire Fox, director of the Institute of Ideas, founder of the Battle of Ideas, a regular panelist on Radio 4's Moral Maze and author of I Find That Offensive!.
According to Politico, Claire delivered an "excoriation of public health devotees". Defending "the adult joys of smoking against the nanny state", she finished her talk with the provocative claim that "Anyone who has ever told you they're addicted to smoking is lying."
Her talk, at a restaurant close to the European Parliament, attracted a full house including European Commission and European Parliament staff plus journalists, NGOs and trade associations.
The format of these events includes a free burger (and several beers) in a private extension that opens on to a dedicated smoking area. As you can see below, it's proving very popular.
The next 'Burning Issues' event takes place in Brussels on Thursday December 7 and features another great speaker – Sinclair Davidson, professor of institutional economics, finance and marketing at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia, senior fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs, and academic fellow at the Australian Taxpayers’ Alliance – who will discuss 'How to torture data to justify public policy’.
Given the proximity to Christmas there will also be free mulled wine. I definitely won't miss that – come and join us!
Reader Comments (3)
I hope there is audio/video of it?
Sorry I missed her speech. I agree with her about addiction and so does objective scientific research. This notion of "quiting" smoking or "becoming an ex-smoker" strikes me as the modern day equivalent of "signing the pledge" so enamoured of the alcohol prohibitionists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
No AV, sadly, because the number of views rarely justifies the expense.