Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
« Reporting Scotland: hospital smoking bans under attack | Main | Fringe benefits »
Monday
Aug242015

Twenty-five? Prove it!

Another fine morning in Edinburgh.

It's our last full day here and there are several shows I'm going to see including 'Margaret Thatcher, Queen of Soho' that Iain Dale has threatened to bring to the Conservative conference in October.

Meanwhile I'm sitting in the kitchen of our rented flat overlooking Rutland Square, coffee to my right, newspapers to my left.

They include the Scottish edition of yesterday's Mail on Sunday which features a report headlined 'Under 25? You need to show ID for cigarettes'.

It includes a quote from me:

"It seems excessive and patronising that the Scottish Government is happy to let people vote at 16 yet is bringing in Challenge 25 for cigarettes and e-cigarettes.

"This seems to be petty and designed to make buying cigarettes increasingly onerous."

It's one thing to prove your age if you're 19 or 20, but 25? At this rate smokers will soon need a chip and pin licence to buy tobacco, with licence-holders sent regular texts and emails 'encouraging' them to quit.

The Challenge 25 policy is one of several measures included in the Health Bill that will be discussed by the Scottish Parliament's Health and Sport Committee next Tuesday.

I'm giving evidence so it's hardly worth going home.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Given that they’ve been telling us for the last few decades how smoking makes smokers look a zillion years older than they actually are, this presumably means that even 14-year-olds nipping into the corner shop to buy a packet illegally won’t be asked to prove a thing. Mind you, if someone asked me for ID because “I didn’t look old enough,” I’d be delighted! “Nearly 60, madam? Goodness me! You don’t look a day over 24.”

Ah – we can but dream …

Monday, August 24, 2015 at 22:58 | Unregistered CommenterMisty

Another example of the Lifestyle Control on steroids.

Monday, August 24, 2015 at 23:16 | Unregistered CommenterVinny Gracchus

Again isn't this more discrimination where tobacco consumers are being singled out? This should be nipped in the bud. I suppose Forest and tobacco companies are powerless to do anything as is normally the case.

Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 15:59 | Unregistered Commentered

Politicians are only for the scrap heap.

Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 18:21 | Unregistered Commentergray

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>