Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
« Lament for New Orleans | Main | Jackie Doyle-Price, friend or foe? »
Tuesday
Apr212015

Sarah Wollaston, friend or foe?

Between now and the General Election on May 7 I'm highlighting a number of 'target seats', those where the candidate standing for re-election has supported anti-tobacco policies, and those where a leading candidate is an opponent of excessive lifestyle regulations and policies that infantilise us all. With a handful of exceptions, including this one, I'm focussing on marginal or semi-marginal seats.

#12 – Totnes (Devon)
Former GP Sarah Wollaston was the first person to be selected as a parliamentary candidate for a major British political party (the Conservatives) via an open primary. Fiercely independent (no bad thing), she was appointed chairman of the Health Select Committee in June 2014 whereupon she declared that the state has a "duty to intervene" to protect current and future generations from unhealthy habits threatening to shorten their lives. She is, needless to say, a strong supporter of plain packaging and other tobacco control policies. Totnes is effectively a battle between the Tories and Lib Dems and given Wollaston's high profile and independent streak it would be a big surprise if she didn't retain her seat.

2010 majority: 4,927 (10.3%)
Estimated number of smokers in Totnes: 13,591
Principal opponent: Liberal Democrat
Friend or foe: Foe
Target rating: Poor

*Based on 20% of the registered electorate in 2010

Note: Marginal seats have been defined as those with majorities of 10% or less that require a swing of 5% for the incumbent party to lose.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

Foe, she'll hold her seat and Ukip,I think will come second hear. The Lib Dem's they have lost so much ground in the South-west now. And back in 2010 Labour only got 3538 votes.

Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 1:10 | Unregistered CommenterGary Rogers

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>