Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
« Our man in Ireland embarks on another mini media adventure | Main | Why newspapers print comments by Forest on e-cigarettes »
Monday
Jan202014

Do you think ecigs should be banned in all public places?

Further to my previous post, today's Daily Record has a short report with this headline:

'Smokers slam ban on cigs'.

It's based on some comments I gave them yesterday.

The Record piece is not online but yesterday's report in the Sunday Mail – the Record's sister paper – now features an online poll:

Do you think electronic cigarettes should be banned in all public places?

Click here to vote.

I have just voted and the current score is:

Yes – 5%
No – 95%

PS. Can you imagine a headline that read 'Vapers slam ban on cigarettes'?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

I have left this comment on the Daily Record. I reproduce it here.

When will you all realize this has nothing to do with health or the safety of e cigarettes. It has everything to do who manufactures these devices.

If these where manufactured by the pharmaceutical industry ASH et all would be applauding them, like their wonder drug chantix.

Monday, January 20, 2014 at 12:57 | Unregistered CommenterAdam

If various government's across the globe start banning e-cigs, is this a question of lost tax revenue? or revenue from the pharmaceutical industry? there's no need to even consider banning e-cigs, before we know it they'll be taxed.

Monday, January 20, 2014 at 18:12 | Unregistered CommenterGary Rogers

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>