Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
« Smoking and the media: if you think it's child's play, give it a go | Main | Wanted: greater transparency from tobacco control lobbyists »
Sunday
Jun022013

Chair of APPG on Smoking and Health defends lobbying but wants transparency

Stephens Williams MP, chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Smoking and Health, has tweeted:

Lobbying is essential part of good law making but needs transparency. And lobbying is diff to dumb MPs & Peers cash for questions #bbcsp

At last, something we can agree on!

But first, I thought I'd check the APPG on Smoking and Health's own record of transparency.

According to the Register of All-Party Groups:

Action on Smoking and Health (a charity) provides administrative support to the group, which includes sharing of information with members of the group, provision of briefing material at meetings, and funding for group receptions and for design, printing, photography, and dissemination costs relating to group publications and stationery.

A small point, perhaps, but don't you think this is a little ingenuous? Can you imagine what our opponents would say if we said that Forest Eireann or the Hands Off Our Packs campaign were funded by Forest without mentioning that Forest is supported by British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco and Gallaher Limited (part of the Japan Tobacco International group of companies)?

Visitors to the ASH (London) website will find a clear statement that ASH receives funding from Cancer Research UK and the British Heart Foundation. In addition however ASH gets money from the Department of Health "to support delivery of the Tobacco Control Plan for England" (but not general campaigning, allegedly), but you have to dig a little deeper for that information.

That leaves the following questions: how much does the APPG on Smoking and Health cost to run, does it receive money from third parties not mentioned on the ASH website, and does it benefit in any financial or material way from the public purse?

For the sake of transparency I think we should be told.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>