Belgium shows the way forward
Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 12:48 I was in Brussels on Monday.
I go there several times a year and I can report that everything was completely normal. The trains ran on time, a taxi took me to and from my hotel without mishap. The shops were doing a roaring trade in (what else?) Belgian chocolates, and it was business as usual.
Today, however, I read that Belgium hits world record for lack of government (EU Observer).
Radio Free Europe confirms that:
At midnight tonight, Belgium will claim the world record for the number of days it has been without an agreement on a government, overtaking the previous record holder, Iraq.
February 18 will mark 250 days since June's inconclusive national elections in which the diametrically opposed New Flemish Alliance and the Francophone Socialist Party won the most seats.
Imagine the United Kingdom without a government for a similar period. Actually, I can. In fact, I think that government, especially Big Government, is over-rated and we would be much better off without it.
The idea that without a proper government a developed Western country cannot go about its daily business is nonsense, and insulting to all law-abiding citizens.
Like the Belgians we would just get on with it, I'm sure.
So, like many people today, I shall drink a toast to Belgium, the country that doesn't have or, indeed, need a government.
PS. We broke off from our meeting on Monday so the smokers could have a cigarette break. We were on the fifth floor of a modern office block in the centre of Brussels. In Britain they would have had to find a balcony - if one existed - or get the lift to the ground floor and stand outside. (It was a cold, damp day and that wouldn't have been very pleasant.)
This was Belgium, though. Separated from the boardroom by an internal wall was a small smoking room. It was narrow - like a walk-in wardrobe - but there was a large window at one end so it felt light and airy. There were also several comfortable chairs, some light maple furniture, and three large ashtrays that almost begged you to light up.
I sat there with one person smoking and I wasn't conscious of any tobacco smoke. (Perhaps I'm unusually tolerant or unobservant.) The room could have accommodated four or five people quite easily and I really can't understand why private companies in Britain are not allowed to provide something similar.
Why government has to stick its nose in and ban such an innocuous but useful facility is incomprehensible to me. What a petty little country we have become. Sadly, if tobacco control has its way, even well-ventilated smoking rooms will be a thing of the past throughout Europe.
Reader Comments (4)
Never had you down as an anarchist, Simon. You sure you've thought this 'no government' thing through?
Did that mean they had no government to enforce the smoking ban during all this time period?
Jonathan,
I think that Brussels only has a partial ban, covering (as was the original idea in the UK), places that sell food. So everyone's happy and nobody's moaning. In fact, I think I recall that when it was suggested to the EU that Brussels, as the seat of the EU Parliament, should surely be the first place to ban all indoor smoking, it was deemed "not appropriate" to enforce such a major health initiative so close to home. Now, I wonder why that was? Surely not that they were concerned that people, being close by, would be perfectly placed to let their feelings be known very directly to the ones making the decision? No, of course not!
If the EU is forcing through smoking bans, then why are the european parliament buildings not smokefree?
Its about one rule for one and another rule for everyone else. Foreign diplomats visiting the UK are provided with smoking lounges and such locations are made exempt from the smoking ban with the authority of The Secretary of State.
It is about dictatorship and complete hypocrisy.