Say No To Nanny

Smokefree Ideology


Nicotine Wars

 

40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
Thursday
Nov022023

Bangers, indoor fireworks, and sparklers - those were the days

The fun police are coming after fireworks.

Nothing new in that, of course. Fireworks have been on their hit list for decades but, according to a report in New Zealand, even the general public is moving in favour of prohibition:

53% of those surveyed want to see fireworks banned for recreational use, with a further 20% wanting to see them banned altogether.

Meanwhile, in the UK, the Independent reports that, 'There are strict rules about where and when you can let off fireworks - but some think that isn’t enough'.

How did it come to this?

When I was a small boy in the Sixties we lived in Maidenhead, Berkshire, and I remember the excitement of waiting for my father to arrive home from work so we could watch him unpack a box of fireworks in our back garden, before lighting each one in turn.

(And, yes, Bob Mortimer is right, they were called Standard Fireworks!)

Rockets attached to a long wooden stick were placed in empty milk bottles. After the fuse was lit they would shoot up into the sky, exploding several feet above the house.

A rogue rocket might develop a mind of its own, but no-one I knew was ever hit by one.

Roman candles were my favourite, while Catherine wheels were arguably the most unreliable, partly because they had to be nailed to a fence or a post so they could spin round.

If it was too loose it might come off as it was spinning. But if it was nailed too tight it wouldn't spin at all, so the effect was ruined.

As small children we were never allowed to light fireworks ourselves, and if there's one piece of advice I remember it's this: stand well back and never return to a lit firework that hasn't gone off.

The problem was, if a firework failed to go off, everyone would stand there unsure what to do, and precious minutes would be lost until it was agreed it was safe to continue.

Arguably the best moment was being given some sparklers which we would wave around, creating patterns in the dark.

What my parents didn't know is that, at the age of just seven or eight, my friends and I would buy small boxes of bangers from the corner shop and take them to school. Hard to believe now, but that's just the way it was.

Aside from sparklers, bangers were the cheapest firework. They looked innocent enough, a small paper tube not unlike a sherbet fountain.

Inside however it was packed with gunpowder and when you lit the fuse with a match (yes, we were allowed to buy those as well) you had no more than a second or two before it exploded with a loud bang.

I don't remember anyone getting into trouble but what I do remember – very clearly – is a story that appeared in the paper.

It featured a boy (a similar age to us) who lost his, er, wedding tackle (as it was then called) when a banger went off in his trouser pocket.

Apparently, it had over-heated and exploded with no need for a match.

I remember reading this and thinking "That could have been me" because we used to sit in class with bangers in our trouser pockets too.

I stopped buying them after that and eventually the law changed to prevent the sale of fireworks to anyone under 18.

Reading this – 'A brief history of bangers: fireworks of legend' – does make me feel nostalgic though:

Bangers … The name of these once-delightful nuisance fireworks still casts a flash of sentimental mischief across the eyes of people of a certain age.

In my teenage years the magic of fireworks began to wear off to the point where I remember standing in our garden overlooking the River Tay in Fife, shivering, while my father laboriously planted each firework in a pot of soil or sand before lighting them, one after the after, with a suitable interval between each one in order to make sure the previous one had gone out.

And that's the problem with organised firework displays as well – far too much hanging around before the action starts!

When my children were young we would watch the village firework display at the local sports ground, but the largest display I have attended in person was the night before the wedding of Charles and Diana in 1981.

It took place in Hyde Park, a short walk from my apartment (I was sharing a flat near Marble Arch), and was accompanied by music performed by, I think, a live orchestra.

It was a huge event attended by tens of thousands of people, and while I saw the fireworks I was so far away I couldn't hear any of the music, which was unfortunate because the fireworks were supposed to complement the score, and vice versa, so some of the pauses didn't make much sense.

Anyway, I must confess that fireworks don't thrill me in the way they once did, but further restrictions or prohibition? Why would you do that?

Like smoking, the recreational use of fireworks is a personal choice, surely? As long as you don't harm anyone else, what has it got to do with government?

The most important factors here are 'courtesy' and 'common sense'. If people over-step the mark we already have laws designed to regulate against anti-social behaviour. Why do we need more legislation?

Anyway, if, like me, you feel nostalgic for 'the old days', do read this – Bonfire Night in the 1950s and 1960s.

Oh, and the story Bob Mortimer told on Would I Lie To You? referred to an incident in which he inadvertently set off fireworks in his own home as a child.

I've never done that, but as a student I did burn a hole in a formica table when an indoor firework turned into a mini Mount Etna, with burning lava (or whatever it was) pouring on to the plastic surface.

(I know, indoor fireworks. Those were the days.)

Tuesday
Oct312023

Park and pay – an unexpected cost of opposing the generational smoking ban

I can’t believe it.

I have just received a parking charge for overstaying my welcome at a motorway service station.

According to the notifying letter, I arrived at 16:05 on Thursday October 5, and left at 18:46, 40 minutes beyond the free parking limit.

There's no point appealing. They've got me bang to rights. They even have photo evidence of my car arriving and leaving.

On the day, though, it never occurred to me that I had done anything wrong because the reason I was parked up for so long is because I was busy working.

I was driving home from Salford, having already done a number of interviews about Rishi Sunak’s plan for a generational tobacco ban, when I agreed to do four ‘drive time’ interviews - the first at 16:10, the last at 18:20.

Rather than risk getting caught in traffic between services, it seemed sensible to pull off the road and do all four interviews while parked at a single service station.

A similar thing happened some years ago when a breaking news story meant I had to spend the best part of three hours at the Kinross service station off the M90 in Fife.

I wasn’t penalised then so the thought that I might be in breach of parking regulations never crossed my mind.

What happens if you are tired and pull off the motorway to have a break at the nearest services, as you are frequently encouraged to do on long journeys?

If you fall asleep and stay beyond two hours, that little rest could cost you as much as £100.

I'll just have to put it down to experience, but the cost of opposing the generational smoking ban is proving expensive already!

Friday
Oct272023

The Battle of Ideas – a breath of fresh air

A quick reminder that I am speaking at the Battle of Ideas in London this weekend.

I wrote about last year's event here, noting that I took part in the first Battle of Ideas in, I think, 2005.

The first BoI took place over four weeks and featured a series of debates and discussions in a number of small venues across London. Writing about it later, I recalled that:

It concluded with a dinner to which every speaker was invited and that was the moment I realised how much more enjoyable it was to exchange views in a civilised manner without being dragged down to the level of party politics or no platformed by adversaries whether it be the tobacco control industry or anyone else.

It was the first time too that I began to realise that the political debate wasn’t as simple as left versus right because the political boundaries are often blurred, especially when it comes to free speech and individual autonomy.

Invited to endorse the event the following year, I commented:

The Battle of Ideas is a breath of fresh air. Freedom of speech is actively encouraged, which is hugely liberating. Audience and speakers are refreshingly candid. Apart from speaking their minds, many of them enjoy a drink. Others like to smoke. This is the real world, not the grey, bland, sanitised world our political masters would like us to inhabit.

In 2007 Forest organised and sponsored the farewell drinks party on board The Elizabethan, the Mississippi-style paddle steamer that we subsequently hired for our own boat party, Smoke On The Water, from 2011 to 2017.

A personal ‘highlight’ was discharging myself from hospital in order to host another farewell party at Ognisko, the smoker-friendly Polish club in South Kensington following the Battle of Ideas in 2008. For the full story of that bizarre weekend click here.

Since then I’ve spoken at the BoI on several occasions, the last time in 2019 (above) when we discussed 'problem lifestyles'.

Free speech is arguably under greater threat than ever. So too is smoking, which is why I was pleased to be invited this year to address the subject 'Freedom: Up In Smoke?' which is also the title of the essay I have just written for the Academy of Ideas.

Today, the Battle of Ideas is almost alone in giving a platform to the 'in defence of smoking' lobby. For that, and many other reasons, I urge you to support it.

Tickets for this weekend's event are available here.

Wednesday
Oct252023

Another Yorkshire post

Just back from a short break in Harrogate.

My wife and I are regular visitors to the picturesque North Yorkshire town.

We started coming here after I was invited, in February 2012, to give a presentation at a seminar hosted by the Federation of Licensed Victuallers at The Old Swan Hotel.

Later, having made my escape, I was lucky enough to get a table in Betty’s, the famous and slightly kitsch Yorkshire tea room, without having to queue round the block.

Bathed in warm winter sun and enjoying a pot of tea with a Fat Rascal, I remember thinking, "I like this town".

Before that I had been to Harrogate twice, I think, each time on business, but it was my second visit, on July 7, 2005, that I remember most because it was the day of the terrorist bombs in London (7/7).

I had been invited - with Deborah Arnott of ASH - to address a meeting at the Local Government Association annual conference. I travelled up the previous day and was in my hotel room watching breakfast television when news of the bombings started filtering through.

One bomb went off at Kings Cross at the same time that I often passed through the station on my way to work at the old Forest office in London.

Several people, thinking I might be at Kings Cross, tried to contact me. However, following the blast, the mobile phone network was down, so they resorted to email and I was able to tell them I was 200 miles away.

The debate with Deborah Arnott went ahead as scheduled but many delegates preferred to watch the unfolding news on the TV monitors in the foyer of the exhibition centre.

Others were busy checking out of their hotels before rushing back to London, so it was a rather muted occasion.

It certainly put the proposed smoking ban in perspective. Why was so much time and energy being spent urging politicians to ban smoking in every pub and club in the country when there were far more important issues to address?

I feel the same about Rishi Sunak’s generational smoking ban. Given everything else that is going on in the world, internationally and at home, it seems preposterous that the Government is allocating precious parliamentary time to banning the sale of cigarettes to future generations.

But I digress.

Over the past ten years Harrogate has become, if not our second home, then our first choice for a short break. Sometimes we stay for two or three nights. Or we stop overnight for dinner and breakfast before driving north through the beautiful Yorkshire Dales and on to my in-laws in Scotland.

We like it so much we've considered moving there. Property isn't cheap, though, so the nearby towns of Ripon or Knaresborough might be more realistic.

Either way, I'll keep you posted!

Above: Autumn leaves in Harrogate this week with the famous Stray in the background; below: outside the Slingsby Gin shop, Christmas 2019

Sunday
Oct222023

Freedom: Up In Smoke?

I have written a short essay for the Academy of Ideas:

From David Hockney to Syrian women smoking cigarettes in defiance of religious extremism, smoking can be an expression of personal and political freedom. Unfortunately, writes Simon, such freedoms are increasingly undermined by public-health measures, designed to control and regulate our behaviour beyond what ought to be reasonable.

‘Freedom: Up In Smoke?’ is part of the Letters on Liberty series of pamphlets and you can download (or purchase) a copy here.

I shall also be discussing the subject at the Battle of Ideas which takes place in London next weekend when I will be joined by philosopher, author and lecturer, Dr Piers Benn, and businessman and former Brexit Party PPC Rick Moore.

Saturday
Oct212023

Are you listening, Rishi?

A friend has reminded me that it was ten years ago this week that I took part in a debate hosted by one of the world's oldest debating societies.

Founded at Durham University in 1842, the Durham Union Society holds weekly Friday night debates on topical issues.

Ironically, in view of Rishi Sunak’s recent announcement, the motion on Friday October 18, 2013, was ‘This House would ban all tobacco products'.

Opposing the motion with me was Nick Barton, a retired headmaster and a tutor at Durham. As I wrote at the time:

What a lovely man. He brought with him a number of pipes and snuff boxes that have passed down through his family, including a pipe that was smoked on the battlefield in the First World War.

He spoke about them, and the pleasure and comfort they had given several generations of his family. He spoke quietly - albeit with a twinkle in his eye - and kept it personal. It was affecting, and effective.

In contrast our principal opponent, Dr George Rae, chairman of the North East BMA, bombarded us with so much information it was hard to keep up or take him seriously after he insisted he was against the nanny state.

The floor contributed some interesting points and questions, but what I remember most was the good-humoured atmosphere, and I sensed the debate was going our way.

Durham Union Society debates are decided by ‘acclamation’ - that is, the biggest roar of support from the chamber - and it was following this process that the chairman (a self-confessed smoker!) announced that the motion to ban all tobacco products had been defeated.

The question is: are you listening, Rishi?

See: Libertarians 1-0 Prohibitionists

Saturday
Oct212023

My first podcast

Until this week the closest I had got to appearing on a podcast was a recent request to take part in the Sky News Daily Podcast.

That fell through because of ‘technical problems’ but not before I had downloaded, as requested, a shiny new app that describes itself as ‘Your online recording studio’.

On Wednesday however I finally joined the global podcasting fraternity when I was interviewed for an episode of TPA Talks, the TaxPayers Alliance podcast.

There are 25 episodes on YouTube and previous guests have included journalist and broadcaster Julia Hartley-Brewer, education reformer Katherine Birbalsingh, and comedian Leo Kearse, so I am in good company.

I arrived shortly after lunch and was led into a small but impressively equipped studio at the back of the TPA’s office in Westminster.

Unfortunately, despite being told that most TPA Talks last 20-30 minutes, verbosity got the better of me and I couldn't stop talking.

Perhaps it was the relaxed, friendly environment, but I’m mortified to report that I was still talking even as we passed the hour mark.

I can only apologise to my hosts who were lovely and far more professional.

I’ll post a link to the edited version when it ‘drops’. Available on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, and other platforms.

Above: with TPA operations manager Benjamin Elks

Tuesday
Oct172023

Tom cruises in to Lord North Street

I’m a little late to this but congratulations to Tom Clougherty who, it was announced on Friday, has won the race to be the new director-general of the Institute of Economic Affairs.

Tom will take over from Mark Littlewood who announced in August that he was stepping down after 14 years.

If you’re unfamiliar with the name, Tom’s think tank pedigree is pretty impressive. A former executive director of the Adam Smith Institute, he subsequently spent several years in America working for the Reason Foundation and the Cato Institute, before returning to the UK to work for the Centre for Policy Studies.

He starts his new job at 2 Lord North Street in December, I believe, and I wish him well.

See also: Mark Littlewood: End of an era

Below from left to right: John Burton, non-executive director of Forest; John O’Connell, director, TaxPayers Alliance; Tom Clougherty; and Dr Eamonn Butler, co-founder, Adam Smith Institute