On the march - PC brigade is now taking over the army
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 11:16
Simon Clark

I was on BBC Radio York this morning responding to a story that was reported yesterday but was initially revealed on social media over the weekend.

According to BBC News:

Smoking and vaping is to be banned at the UK's only Army training centre for teenage recruits.

As I explained to the presenter on BBC Radio York, it’s a slightly difficult subject for Forest to respond to because we don’t want to be accused of supporting 16 and 17-year-olds who smoke or vape.

Nevertheless, I did point out that it is not illegal to smoke or vape at 16 or 17. The law merely bans the sale of tobacco to under 18s.

Therefore, threatening to charge young soldiers for smoking (or vaping) seems to me rather unfair, if not a classic case of discrimination.

I suspect the ruling could be challenged in court but I’m not going to risk Forest’s money on an uncertain outcome, especially when such a case would win little public support and would be defended by the army with taxpayers’ money.

The point is, to be found guilty of a chargeable offence and have that on your army record could have an adverse effect on a young soldier’s career. Is smoking really such a terrible thing to do, even at 16 or 17?

Banning young recruits from smoking also ignores two major issues that affect young soldiers - boredom and stress. Prohibiting a habit that helps relieve those two factors doesn’t make a lot of sense unless you have a plan to replace it with something else.

On Twitter over the weekend Lt Col Richard Hall was keen to talk about “protecting” young people’s health. Others have suggested that recruits will be physically fitter and healthier if they don’t start smoking.

Really? When did ‘not smoking’ become a factor in being a physically fit soldier? Are there any studies - with groups of young soldiers who smoke pitted against young recruits who don’t smoke - that prove this point?

Smoking-related illnesses are, by and large, problems that affect people in later life, decades after they have left the army.

I’m not suggesting the army should have no interest in a soldier’s future welfare, but smoking is a matter of choice and I’m not aware of evidence that suggests it can seriously impair a soldier’s ability to do his job.

Talking of which, there is a certain irony, is there not, that within a year or two of joining the army young recruits may find themselves dodging bullets in a war zone. Oddly enough, the army seems fine about that!

Frankly, this seems to be yet another example of the middle class (in this case officers) dictating how the ‘plebs’ (aka the rank and file soldier) should live their lives.

And don’t think this is aimed exclusively at junior soldiers. As Lt Col Hall made clear on Twitter, from 2020 all soldiers will be banned from lighting up in front of recruits on camp.

In other words, it’s a Trojan horse. Eventually all soldiers, regardless of their age, will be barred from lighting up (except, perhaps, senior officers who will still be allowed to smoke a cigar with a glass of brandy in the officers’ mess).

The PC brigade is well and truly on the march. The army is their latest conquest.

Article originally appeared on Simon Clark (http://taking-liberties.squarespace.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.