Forest Unfiltered

 

 

 

 

 



40 Years of Hurt

Prejudice and Prohibition

Road To Ruin?

Search This Site
The Pleasure of Smoking

Forest Polling Report

Outdoor Smoking Bans

Plain Packaging

Share This Page
Powered by Squarespace
« Welcome to Harrogate | Main | Smoking: pathetic addiction or lifestyle choice? »
Wednesday
Feb132019

Shaming smokers doesn't work, say researchers

Interesting report on the BBC News website yesterday:

Mothers-to-be who smoke or drink could be hiding their habits in private - because of negative reactions, a study has found.

You think so?

The study claimed women who smoke or drank during pregnancy said they had "awkward" relationships with their midwives and would receive health advice in a "judgemental tone", making them less likely to seek support.

Dr Aimee Grant, from Cardiff University's Centre for Trials Research, said:

“Moral judgements are commonly directed towards mothers through reference to health behaviour in pregnancy, and working-class mothers are particularly subject to this criticism, ignoring the challenges of living on a low income.

“Our study shows that these looks and comments - including by members of the public - irritate and alienate pregnant women, making them less likely to seek help. No one wants to be judged and shamed."

Dr Dunla Gallagher, also from the study team, said smoking is a "coping strategy" for some low-income, expectant mothers.

She said: "Rather than stigma, women need empathy and a recognition of the challenges that pregnancy can bring in terms of women's independent choices."

Empathy for smokers, pregnant or otherwise, has of course been in short supply for years.

In 2004 the Labour health minister John Reid argued that for a young single mother living on a sink estate, a cigarette might be one of the few pleasures she had.

According to the Guardian:

Mr Reid said that the middle classes were obsessed with giving instruction to people from lower socio-economic backgrounds and that smoking was not one of the worst problems facing poorer people.

“I just do not think the worst problem on our sink estates by any means is smoking, but it is an obsession of the learned middle class," he said. "What enjoyment does a 21-year-old single mother of three living in a council sink estate get? The only enjoyment sometimes they have is to have a cigarette."

A former heavy smoker who was member of parliament for one of the poorest constituencies in the country, Reid almost certainly knew what he was talking about, but it didn’t stop the middle class puritans in public health venting their fury at his heretical statement.

Since then successive governments, egged on by those same joyless campaigners, have embarked on a relentless campaign to denormalise not just smoking but smokers as well.

They have shown not a jot of empathy or compassion for people who choose to smoke, not even those for whom smoking offers a brief moment of respite from life’s daily challenges.

Every increase in tobacco duty, for example, is applauded despite the fact that it's designed to make life harder for the less well off in the hope that it will force them to quit.

If they continue to smoke anti-smoking campaigners then have the nerve to argue that smoking is forcing people further into poverty, washing their hands of any responsibility for this shameful state of affairs.

Current targets include pregnant women and hospital patients who smoke. The aim is to stigmatise both groups until they too succumb to the pressure to quit.

I’m pleased therefore that the Cardiff study highlights not only the lack of empathy for mothers-to-be who smoke but also notes that the 'negative feedback' from midwives and anti-smoking partners doesn't seem to have much impact apart from irritating and alienating them.

There’s a reason for this and it’s called human nature. People don’t like being nagged or bullied and the natural inclination is to rebel, in this instance quietly and in private.

Of course, driven by their innate sense of superiority, anti-smoking zealots are unlikely to change their strategy any time soon.

Meanwhile another report currently doing the rounds blames budget cuts for eroding ‘the support (sic) pregnant women need to stop smoking’.

Recent headlines include ‘The shocking number of pregnant women smoking in Liverpool’, ‘Thousands of pregnant Brummie women are STILL smoking’ and ‘A sixth of women in North East still smoke when they give birth’.

The aim of this campaign is, I imagine, two-fold:

One, it maintains the pressure on pregnant women to stop smoking; two, it politicises the issue by turning it into a debate about money.

According to Elizabeth Duff, senior policy adviser for the National Childbirth Trust:

“Smoking cessation support is now being funded under local authorities as opposed to public health.

“We know that local authority budgets cuts have eroded the support that women need and that’s why we’re seeing little progress.”

There's a simple reason why councils are cutting budgets for stop smoking services and it's this.

Since 2010 the number of smokers using smoking cessation services to help them quit has dropped by over 50 per cent.

This is partly because there are fewer smokers who want to quit, and partly because many of those that do are doing it for themselves – by switching to vaping, for example.

Instead of bemoaning the reduction in funding, tobacco control campaigners should look closer to home and stop demonising smokers because it's clearly counter-productive.

Better still they should show some empathy and allow adults to make their own choices without fear of stigmatisation or worse.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

It's not about health but about inciting hatred against people who smoke so with that aim, stigmatisation is doing the job those described by Reid planned to do.

I have said it before, and I'll keep saying it, having the likes of Deborah Arnott and her hate group ASH pretty much running the department of health's hate campaign against smokers is akin to having Nick Griffin and the BNP running the immigration department in the Home Office. The government needs to ask itself serious questions about the type of people it is giving such power to.

Why are we forced to pay for such hatred to be inspired against us when we have harmed no one except in the heads of those puritan middle class snobs who turn up their nose at the sight of a poor person - people, incidentally, that they use to promote more of their exclusive, discriminatory and abusive policies.

The smoking issue is not about health. It is about snobbery and hatred.

Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 16:28 | Unregistered Commenterpat nurse

Is vaping a choice for smokers though? I know smokers who have switched to vaping not because they want to but because they are forced to due to tax hikes on tobacco. Apparently it costs £10 a week to vape and £11 a day to smoke. Where, then, is the choice? If it was a level playing field the fad of vaping would be gone within a couple of years.

Saying smokers choose to vape is as much of a scam as saying they choose to quit. Both are forced upon smokers using the thumb screws of cost, stigmatisation, discrimination and exclusion.

Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 16:48 | Unregistered Commenterpat nurse

Sorry, I know I shouldn't laugh, but those headlines did give me a mental picture of a pregnant woman and a team of midwives all puffing away furiously as she gives birth (as opposed to the reality, which would probably be them all lighting up as soon after - given half the chance).

Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 20:41 | Unregistered CommenterManx Gent

Shaming smokers is no more than a form of persecution The systematic stigma applied to smokers is a deliberate tactic to further the ultimate goal of prohibition. As many have recognized this campaign of persecution has little to do with health and is really about control and power. The actual health effects of smoking have been deliberately obscured and exaggerated over the years. This manipulation of science for ideological ends must stop. The relentless propaganda furthering the antismoker crusade must be challenged and the hate directed at smokers curtailed.

Thursday, February 14, 2019 at 6:36 | Unregistered CommenterVinny Gracchus

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>