Yesterday was the closing date for our e-petition to review the smoking ban.
Final number of signatures – 5,562.
Now, I can't gloss over the fact that this falls far short of what we would like to have achieved but I don't regret giving it a go and I disagree strongly with some of the boorish comments the petition has attracted elsewhere.
You need national or local media interest to generate significant support for an e-petition. The backing of a big public sector body helps. Ditto a large union or membership organisation. It's helpful too if the issue is topical.
We scored poorly in all these areas.
In comparison however to other tobacco-related e-petitions (including anti-tobacco ones), ours did respectably well. Consider, for example, the number of people who signed these e-petitions (now also closed):
Now consider the e-petitions that are still open. They include:
Add the responses to ALL these e-petitions together and the total number of signatories (some of which may be duplicated) is 1,405.
In that context our e-petition did OK. In fact I can't find a single tobacco-related e-petition (for or against) that has attracted close to 1,000 supporters let alone 5,000+.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying it was a success, I'm just saying it wasn't the embarrassment that some armchair critics seem to think it was.
My final word on the subject is to thank everyone who supported it. Thanks too to all the bloggers who promoted it and added the e-petition button to their own blogs.
Thanks, most of all, to Forest patron Antony Worrall Thompson for lending his name to the petition. He didn't have to but he was prepared to stick his head above the parapet. Not many 'celebrities' would have done that.
Anyway, if you don't at first succeed, try, try and try again. (Have I mentioned that 235,000 people signed our petition against plain packaging of tobacco?)